Nevada, intercepting a wire communication (NRS 200.620(1))
For phone calls, Nevada's text asks for one party's prior consent and an emergency with no time for a court order; one party's consent alone does not meet it. That is why Nevada is listed as all-party for calls.
Dated 19 Oct 2026Source checked 19 Oct 2026Basis: primary text
In the source's own words
“1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5 and NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, 209.419 and 704.195, it is unlawful for any person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire communication unless: ... (a) The interception or attempted interception is made with the prior consent of one of the parties to the communication; and ... (b) An emergency situation exists and it is impractical to obtain a court order as required by NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, before the interception, in which event the interception is subject to the requirements of subsection 3.”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in these 2 guides