Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: fair use rejected on summary judgment
Partial summary judgment for Thomson Reuters; later certified for interlocutory appeal.
Dated 11 Feb 2025Source checked 11 Feb 2025Page out of reach at the last check, 17 Oct 2026Basis: stated
In the source's own words
“(2) grant Thomson Reuters’s motion for partial summary judgment on fair use, D.I. 672; (3) deny Ross’s motion for summary judgment on fair use, D.I. 676 ... Ross infringed 2,243 headnotes.”
Where it was read
Also read from the same source
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): market for AI training data (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): the refused licence (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
- Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, District of Delaware memorandum opinion (11 February 2025): only non-generative AI (Thomson Reuters Enter. Ctr. GmbH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 1:20-cv-613-SB (D. Del. Feb. 11, 2025), D.I. 770)
What it is about
Figures it counts in
It is shown on its own, not counted into a figure.
Cited in this guide