Kinds of data

Source code

Private repositories with their history: commits, reviews and the tickets they answer.

Public price
$934 to $24.2K

per repository

Demand
Split
Who buys
Coding-data vendors, environment builders, labs

The market rate for source code, by side

How the rates are computed

The median where three or more figures exist, otherwise the figures we hold. Each side is a different point in the market: what the people who make it are paid, what holders are offered, what catalogues ask, what was paid.

Paid to the people who make it

$130

per task, median of 7 figures; middle half $99 to $730

Paid to the people who make it

$118

per hour of work, median of 4 figures; middle half $92 to $151

Offered to holders

$1,478

per repository, median of 6 figures; middle half $934 to $24.2K

Offered to holders

$0.00004 to $0.0001

per token, from 2 figures

Offered to holders

$1,000

per pull request, from 1 figure

Sales that happened

$1,579

per repository, from 1 figure

Asking prices off the shelf

$99 to $65.8K

per repository, from 2 figures

Asking prices off the shelf

$0.0025

per record, from 1 figure

Made to order

$8.94

per record, from 1 figure

Cost to produce

$0.5

per record, from 1 figure

What source code has sold or been offered for

The whole price board
  • Review and upgrade of one real-world coding, data or automation scenario used to train AI assistants (Python, JavaScript, SQL, n8n, Make, Zapier), Vetto Coding, Data and Automations Experts
    Price
    US$ 30 per approved task

    per approved task, about 40 minutes each

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Vetto (a Brazilian-founded expert network) pays the reviewer per approved task in local currency; its own effective rate is about $45 an hour. Read on AITraining.jobs, which has the same owner as AIData.Broker, quoting Vetto's posting (posted about seven months before the read, so dated by the read day).
  • Original SWE-bench style coding task authored from the contributor's own private codebase (maintainer-style issue, hidden fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass tests, reference solution), AfterQuery University SWE Expert
    Price
    $75 per task that is fully approved

    per fully approved task

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    AfterQuery pays the contributor only for tasks that pass automated validation (up to five attempts), on top of $300 per codebase connected; the same terms appear in AfterQuery's SWE Experts posting dated 14 Aug 2026, which also states $150 an hour. Undated posting, read on 2026-10-14.
  • Access to a substantial private codebase the contributor owns, used as the basis for SWE coding tasks (AfterQuery University SWE Expert)
    Price
    $300 per codebase you connect and use as a basis for tasks

    per codebase connected

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Paid to the owner of the private codebase per codebase used, separate from the $75 per approved task; the lowest per-repository figure a named buyer publishes, against $10K to $100K+ at Turing's Lazarus programme.
  • A well-documented, production-grade private codebase licensed on HUD's DataVendor marketplace
    Price
    up to $20,000 each

    per codebase

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    HUD's current ceiling, up from 'up to $10K' in June 2026. The marketplace says codebases have licensed for this much; it takes a 20% platform fee at withdrawal, so the holder nets up to $16,000. Read from the markdown copy the docs publish, because the rendered page typesets its dollar amounts as math and scrambles them for any reader but a browser; unchanged on 15 Oct 2026.
  • Custom coding dataset for LLM fine-tuning, focused single-language (1,000 to 5,000 pairs), made to order by LXT
    Price
    $20K for focused single-language datasets (1,000-5,000 pairs)

    per project of 1,000 to 5,000 pairs

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    A vendor's published entry price for made-to-order code data; the page names it as where projects start, not a rate card. Undated page, read on 2026-10-14.
  • Custom coding dataset for LLM fine-tuning, large multi-language and multi-task with execution-verified code, made to order by LXT
    Price
    $150K+

    per project

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Open-ended top of LXT's stated range; no size is given, so no per-pair figure. Undated page, read on 2026-10-14.
  • Reproducible coding RL environment (feature implementation or bug fix with a deterministic verifier and a golden reference solution), micro1 Software Engineer (GitHub Contributor)
    Price
    $50-100/hour, ~15 hours per run

    per hour, about 15 hours per task

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Paid hourly; the per-task figure is the hourly band times micro1's own stated time per task, so it moves with how long a task really takes. A twin posting (Software Engineer, Open Source Contributor) states the same pay and time.
  • Git history (commits and their messages) licensed by the token through Pangea's code licensing partner
    Price
    $40 /M tokens of git history

    per million tokens of git history

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    An indicative standing rate, paid on top of the source-code rate for the same repository.
  • Private codebases licensed through Pangea's network to date: total paid to owners
    Price
    $600,000 across 380 codebases

    in total, across 380 codebases

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    The intermediary's own count of realised payouts. The average, about $1,579 a codebase, sits inside its 'typical' tier and far below the five- and six-figure ceilings buyers advertise.
  • A private repository of deep depth, licensed non-exclusively through Pangea's code licensing partner
    Price
    $1,500–$2,000 per repo (deep)

    per repository, per licence

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    What the owner is paid per licence by Pangea's unnamed partner; Pangea calls its figures deliberately conservative estimates, not guaranteed payouts. Non-exclusive, so a repository can earn this more than once.
  • A private repository of light depth, licensed non-exclusively through Pangea's code licensing partner
    Price
    $700–$1,000 per repo (light)

    per repository, per licence

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    What the owner is paid per licence by Pangea's unnamed partner; Pangea calls its figures deliberately conservative estimates, not guaranteed payouts. Non-exclusive, so a repository can earn this more than once.
  • A private repository of typical depth, licensed non-exclusively through Pangea's code licensing partner
    Price
    $1,000–$1,500 per repo (typical)

    per repository, per licence

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    What the owner is paid per licence by Pangea's unnamed partner; Pangea calls its figures deliberately conservative estimates, not guaranteed payouts. Non-exclusive, so a repository can earn this more than once.
  • Private source code licensed by the token through Pangea's code licensing partner
    Price
    $100 /M tokens of source code

    per million tokens of source code

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    An indicative standing rate, the owner's side with nothing deducted; final value depends on the partner's analysis and buyer demand. A job-board copy of the same rates names Gramian Consulting Group.
  • AtCoder competitive-programming dataset (problems, test data, accepted and failed user solutions) licensed to AI companies
    Price
    budget is $100,000 or more

    minimum per licence

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Seller's own minimum order across four tiers (problems only, starter, all accepted, everything); full price list not yet published, and licensing of user code began August 2026.
    Source
    AtCoder Datasets

    The payer's own page

  • GitHub repositories dataset (3.4M+ records: repository attributes, languages, sizes, contributions, issues, pull requests, forks) sold by Bright Data
    Price
    $250 for 100K records (approximately $0.0025 per record)

    per 100,000 records (one-time)

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Public repository metadata, not licensed source code; a floor for what scraped public code facts cost.
    Source
    Bright Data, GitHub datasets

    A catalogue or marketplace listing

  • Data-structures-and-algorithms code repositories with programming solutions, price for an initial batch of 1,000 repositories
    Price
    $98,700

    per initial batch of 1,000 repositories

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Asking price on the Opendatabay marketplace (USD since 1 Oct 2026, converted from GBP at $1 = GBP 0.76); seller-stated volumes and rights, not verified by us. Small exercise-style repositories, not production systems. Listed 4 Aug 2026.
  • Legacy software codebases across 20+ industries (400+ codebases, 204M+ lines, 420K+ commits in the full set), price for an initial batch of 20 million lines
    Price
    $196,100

    per initial batch of 20 million lines of code

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Asking price on the Opendatabay marketplace (USD since 1 Oct 2026, converted from GBP at $1 = GBP 0.76); seller-stated volumes and rights, not verified by us. The repository count in the batch is not stated, so no per-repository figure. Listed 4 Aug 2026.
    Source
  • 240+ private commercial repositories with full git history (300,000+ commits, ~42M lines, 44,000+ merged MRs with descriptions, ~463M tokens), de-identified
    Price
    $263,200

    per dataset of 240+ repositories

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    Asking price on the Opendatabay marketplace (USD since 1 Oct 2026, converted from GBP at $1 = GBP 0.76); seller-stated volumes and rights, not verified by us. At about $6 per merged MR it lists two orders of magnitude under Turing's $1,000 per PR offer. Listed 8 Sep 2026.
    Source
  • A private repository bought by Turing's Project Lazarus for AI training (all languages, priced on quality and complexity)
    Price
    Repos typically pay $10k–$100k+ depending on quality and complexity.

    per repository

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    The buyer's own seller-facing statement, broader than the legacy-only $10K to $100K+ figure on the board; the same page prices modern codebases at $1K per PR up to $10K and pays up to $1M for a whole company's record.
    Source
  • One self-contained database engineering task for AI agents (engine implementation, production diagnosis or application migration) with a reproducible repository, reference solution, tests and grading criteria, Mercor Database Systems Evaluation Expert pilot
    Price
    $2.2K per task

    per task, about 25 hours of work

    When
    Oct 2026
    What to know
    A pilot for the first three qualifying applicants (applications close 16 Oct 2026, task due 30 Oct 2026), each completing one task; at the stated 25 hours it is about $88 an hour. Highest per-task coding rate on Mercor's board on the day read.
  • Code Agent Trajectories: 551 verified PASS trajectories from an autonomous code agent in a sandboxed Python environment (reasoning, tool calls, final answer; JSONL, 5.63 MB), sold by Jurgen's Data Lab on Getly
    Price
    $100.00

    per dataset of 551 trajectories

    When
    Sep 2026
    What to know
    Machine-generated (an agent's runs judged PASS by an LLM), sold by a one-person storefront with commercial use allowed and no resale; the bottom of the market. The same seller lists a 177-trajectory PASS plus reasoning subset at $150 and a 924-entry bundle of its three sets at $250.
  • Premium: 177 verified PASS agent trajectories that also carry full chain-of-thought reasoning (JSONL, ATIF-v0.2, 1.3 MB), sold by Jurgen's Data Lab on Getly
    Price
    $150.00

    per dataset of 177 trajectories

    When
    Sep 2026
    What to know
    Machine-generated (an agent's runs judged PASS by an LLM), commercial use allowed, no resale of the file. The top-quality subset of the seller's 551-trajectory set (held at $100); costs 1.5 times the larger set for 177 entries, so the reasoning text is what is priced. The same seller also lists a 196-entry chain-of-thought set at $75 and a bundle of all three sets at $250; both repackage these same trajectories, so they are not counted as separate figures.
    Source
    Getly, Jurgen's Data Lab: Premium

    A catalogue or marketplace listing

  • Software engineering expert pool (writing engineering problems with reference answers, grading model-written code)
    Price
    $70 to $150 an hour

    per hour

    When
    Sep 2026
    What to know
    Mercor's own summary of what its software-engineering projects have paid; a standing pool, not one project.
  • A failed startup's codebase
    Price
    Tens of thousands of dollars

    per codebase

    When
    Sep 2026
    What to know
    One buyer bought five to ten of them. Code alone, without the tickets and discussion around it, is the cheapest company record.
    Source
    Fortune

    Press report

  • Application user recording real work in Visual Studio Code on macOS (computer-use data)
    Price
    $55-$65 per hour

    per hour

    When
    Sep 2026
    What to know
    One of a family of per-application listings (PyCharm, Android Studio and others at the same rate); the worker supplies the machine and licence.
  • A private repository, graded by the platform
    Price
    $5,000 baseline

    per repository

    When
    Sep 2026
    What to know
    Troveo's guide citing an unnamed codebase-buying platform's listed baseline, adjusted after grading. Production history, linked tickets and reviews, clean rights and an unusual domain raise it.
  • Data-Analysis-Platform: one private multi-service enterprise Git repository with full history (5,683 commits, 1,474 tracked files, about 108,761 lines; Terraform, Python backend, IAM, SQL migrations, API tests), sold by Octobit8 on Opendatabay
    Price
    $65,800

    per repository (one repository, about 10.5 MB with history)

    When
    Sep 2026
    What to know
    A seller's asking price on an open marketplace; the commit history spans about two years (Feb 2023 to Jan 2025), listed 10 Aug 2026, updated 2 Sep 2026. Opendatabay converted all GBP prices to USD on 1 Oct 2026 at $1 = 0.76 GBP, so this figure is a conversion of the seller's GBP price. Licence grants non-exclusive AI training rights, no resale.
  • Codebase-exploration RL task on a production Python repository (Django, Twisted, Scrapy, SymPy, mypy, pip and others), Mercor Codebase Q&A
    Price
    $130 per approved task

    per approved task

    When
    Aug 2026
    What to know
    Same project and rate as the Go, C and TypeScript tracks; listing active when read. Mercor posts the same $130 per approved task for its Go, C, TypeScript tracks (read 2026-10-14), so scarcer systems languages earn no premium; counted once because it is one programme at one rate. Closed: Mercor shows the posting no longer accepting applications (read 2026-10-17).
  • Legacy codebase migration expert designing and grading migration tasks for a frontier AI lab
    Price
    $200 per hour

    per hour

    When
    Aug 2026
    What to know
    The top hourly rate on the board for code work; legacy migration (COBOL, old Java and .NET) is also what Turing pays most for as codebases.
  • Frontier Code Agents project for an unnamed AI research lab: use AI coding agents to complete and evaluate realistic engineering tasks, review model-generated code for bugs and edge cases (Mercor, Backend Engineer, Coding Agent Experience)
    Price
    $400 per accepted task

    per accepted task

    When
    Jun 2026
    What to know
    One programme at one rate: the Data Engineer, ML Engineer and DevOps/SRE/Cloud Engineer postings of the same project (all created 2026-06-15) state the same $400 and 2 to 3 hours, and the Software Engineers (Coding Agents Experience) posting of 2026-01-13 states $400 and 1 to 3 hours. All are closed (no longer accepting applications) when read; the figure sits in each posting's own description data, while the visible page now shows Mercor's standing $70 to $150 an hour band. About three times Mercor's $130 codebase Q&A task.
  • One prompt-and-code-review task (writing a prompt, A/B comparing two models' code and picking the better) for Claude Code fine-tuning, Snorkel AI's project Marlin for Anthropic
    Price
    up to $280 per task

    per task, typically about an hour

    When
    Jun 2026
    What to know
    Two contractors' account to Business Insider, relayed by a news summary because the Business Insider article was not fetched; a ceiling, not a published rate. At about an hour a task, up to about $280 an hour, far above the $30 to $130 per-task rates platforms post for comparable review.
  • Code repository seeded with an OSS-fuzz-style vulnerability plus a validated patch, AfterQuery Cybersecurity Expert
    Price
    Earn $300 per accepted task. Each successfully accepted task pays $50

    per accepted task

    When
    May 2026
    What to know
    The posting states two figures for the same accepted task, $300 in its headline and $50 in its next sentence, plus bonuses up to $180 per repository; the range keeps both. The listing's structured pay also shows $75 an hour.
  • Legacy private codebase (COBOL, .NET, Java) licensed to Turing for AI training
    Price
    $10K to $100K+ depending on complexity

    per codebase

    When
    Mar 2026
    What to know
    Turing's own published buy-side price guide for Project Lazarus; the top is open-ended and the final price depends on complexity.
    Source
    Turing (AGI Advance newsletter, Project Lazarus)

    A vendor's published price guide

  • Modern private codebase priced by pull request (Turing Project Lazarus)
    Price
    $1,000 per PR, up to $10K per codebase

    per pull request (capped per codebase)

    When
    Mar 2026
    What to know
    Modern codebases are paid per PR with a $10K ceiling per codebase, far below the legacy-language range from the same buyer.
    Source
    Turing (AGI Advance newsletter, Project Lazarus)

    A vendor's published price guide

  • 258k test-verified coding-agent trajectories across 1,655 repositories (CoderForge-Preview, generated synthetically)
    Price
    total cost of generating ... was $130k

    per dataset (about $0.50 per trajectory, derived)

    When
    Feb 2026
    What to know
    A production cost at Together's own API prices, released free; it marks a floor for synthetic coding traces, not a sale price.
    Source
    Together AI

    A vendor's published price guide

  • Coding-benchmark task work in React, TypeScript or JavaScript: curate issues, solutions and test suites from real-world repositories for AI labs (Mercor, Frontend Software Engineer), hourly base plus a bonus per approved task
    Price
    $90 per hour plus lucrative bonus per approved task (1 task takes approximately 1 hour to complete); Median average pay inclusive of bonuses is $200/hr

    per hour (base), and median pay per hour including per-task bonuses

    When
    Nov 2025
    What to know
    Mercor states an hourly base plus an unstated bonus per approved task of about an hour; the $200 is its own median hourly pay including bonuses. Closed (no longer accepting applications) when read; one-month, 15 to 20 hours a week project.
  • Professional developers' code snippets, edit history, prompts and terminal usage shared with JetBrains for AI training
    Price
    free All Products Pack subscriptions for one year ... currently priced at $979.00 per user/year

    per developer per year (paid in software licences)

    When
    Oct 2025
    What to know
    Payment in kind, not cash, to selected organisations that opt in; the closest public price for real-world professional coding traces per seat.
    Source
    The Register

    Press report

What yours might fetch

A first answer or two gives a range. The full valuation asks the rest and shows where every figure comes from.

What is your data worth?

Kind of data
Substantial private repositories
Main language

$3,700to$25,000

On two answers, against 3 public prices. An indication, not an offer.

Full valuation
  • No data upload
  • No account
  • Free

Why labs pay for it

Public code is already in every model. What is not public, and above all the history that shows how a change was requested, argued over and shipped, is what teaches a model to work the way engineers do.

SplitOrdinary web and app code is now a commodity with at least seven intermediaries chasing it (2026). Scarce languages and code tied to its tickets still command a premium.

Who holds it
  • Software companies
  • Closed startups
  • Agencies and independent developers
  • Industrial and embedded teams
What it looks like
  • A product's full repository history
  • Code in scarce languages: COBOL, Fortran, Verilog, ABAP, PLC
  • Internal tools nobody outside has seen
  • Repositories with linked issues and reviews
Raises the price
  • Reviews and tickets linked to the commits
  • A scarce language or an unusual domain: embedded, scientific, industrial, finance
  • Years of real production history
  • Code a buyer can actually run
Lowers it
  • Common web or app code with no history
  • Generated code, duplicates and third-party libraries, which buyers strip out first
  • Open-source licences or client ownership over parts of it
The rights question

Code written for a client usually belongs to the client. Open-source components keep their own licences, and a contractor's work is yours only if the contract says so.

How we take it to buyers

Single repositories are best sold direct to the platforms that grade and list them; we say so and point you there. We take on codebases that come with their tickets, their history or a scarce language, and whole-company sales.

Who buys it

Turing (Lazarus)

"A single payout of up to $1M" for an operating record. For code repositories its process page (lazarus.turing.com/process, read 16 Oct 2026) says "Repos typically pay $10k–$100k+ depending on quality and complexity".

Ooak

"Earn up to $1M" (raised from $300K by 15 Oct 2026). Deals to date run from $20K to several hundred thousand dollars.

Labelbox (Prism)

"Smaller targeted datasets starting around $50K and large enterprise partnerships reaching $1M+".

Troveo

"AI labs and startups are actively paying six figures for company data exports", and Troveo pays the holder "on every sale, not just the first".

Corpus Bridge

It cites licences of about $10,000 to several hundred thousand dollars for ordinary companies.

SimpleClosure AssetHub

"Tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for unique assets". Early deals were reported at $10,000 to $100,000.

Datacurve (Shipd)

Example bounties in the sample panels on its homepage run from $80 to $220 (read 16 Oct 2026; 2,847 registered contributors on its live counter). The panels show sample issues and challenges, not a rate card: "New quests launch every month across dozens of STEM categories".

Mercor

No figures. "Compensation is based on data volume, the tools you connect, and the depth of your data."

Where source code comes from

The whole supply map
Sell source code to AI labs: prices, buyers and rights | AIData.Broker